|
















| |
AgWeekly.com
(Twin Falls, Idaho) – Monday – May 3, 2010 – 12:22 p.m. CDT
USDA's present course of action is insanity redefined
By
Max Thornsberry DVM, MBA, R-CALF USA President
As we've all
been told by our mothers, and as any veterinarian will tell you, prevention is
the best of all medicines.
As cattle producers, we spend billions to prevent diseases from infecting our
livestock through vaccination programs and good husbandry practices.
Collectively, our livestock industry spent billions more in eradicating diseases
from within our border for the same reason - to prevent diseases from infecting
U.S. livestock.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) was once our partner in disease
prevention. For decades the U.S. livestock industry worked shoulder-to-shoulder
with USDA to eradicate and control such diseases as foot-and-mouth disease (FMD),
brucellosis, bovine tuberculosis (TB) and many others. And, USDA did a superb
job of preventing disease from being reintroduced through our borders by
imposing strict restrictions on imports of livestock and livestock products that
could cause disease introduction.
Whatever happened to those good ol' days?
In recent years, USDA has knowingly allowed the continued reintroduction of
bovine TB by not adequately restricting imports of Mexican cattle that originate
in areas with high rates of the disease.
USDA has lifted its restrictions on the importation of older Canadian cattle
even though its own risk evaluation predicts that we will introduce bovine
spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) into the U.S. as a result.
USDA has
twice attempted to lift FMD restrictions for certain states within countries
with long histories of FMD outbreaks. The agency attempted to do this through a
process advocated by the World Trade Organization (WTO) and known as
"regionalization."
Fortunately for domestic livestock producers, reports of FMD outbreaks in those
countries forced USDA to withdraw its regionalization plans and our FMD import
restrictions were restored in time to prevent FMD from entering our country.
As recently as Dec. 28, 2009, USDA published a final rule to declare South Korea
free of FMD with an effective date of Jan. 11, 2010. But, on Jan. 6, 2010, South
Korea began reporting new outbreaks of FMD, and USDA was again forced to back
off.
Despite
these recent and notable failures associated with USDA's efforts to regionalize
countries with long histories of FMD outbreaks and to lift FMD import
restrictions, USDA remains undeterred. It is bound and determined to allow
products with a high risk for FMD into the United States.
Earlier this month, USDA announced its plans to regionalize the Brazilian state
of Santa Catarina. Within the past five years, Brazil experienced outbreaks of
FMD in a state that directly borders Santa Catarina and in a state in close
proximity to Santa Catarina, which resulted in the depopulation of over 26,000
head of Brazilian cattle.
Over the past several years USDA has defied and ignored its congressional
responsibility to prevent the introduction of animal diseases. Instead, USDA
appears to be marching to the orders of a higher authority - the WTO - that is
repulsed by the United States' exemplary record of disease prevention and wants
to lower the United States down to a standard consistent with the rest of the
world. This should be the new definition of insanity.
This is wrong.
And, unless we cattle producers stand up to reverse USDA's present course,
disease prevention - our best and most effective means of protecting the health
of our domestic livestock - will be but a memory for us to share with our
grandkids.
I'm willing to do something about this. Are you?
http://www.agweekly.com/articles/2010/05/03/news/opinion/opin73.txt
Copyright © 2010 Ag Weekly
NOTE: In accordance with
Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted material herein is distributed
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes
only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
|